|
Tuesday, 09 April 2013 15:30 |
|
While regulatory matters are not of interest to everyone involved in the aviation industry, almost its entire community has heard of 'EU 261'.
This infamous regulation, introduced in 2005, was a first attempt to put in place a set of European-wide rules to protect passengers in the event of flight cancellations and delays. However, the regulation was badly written, ambiguous, open ended and has proved to be a nightmare to implement and enforce for both operators and consumers alike. It has caused conflicts between passengers and airlines, provoked unfortunate headlines in the press and has resulted in a number of high profile court cases where disagreements on its interpretation has led the European Court of Justice to effectively rewrite the law.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Wednesday, 20 March 2013 17:00 |
|
This issue of Regional International focuses on the Air Traffic Management (ATM) in Europe. It is a key strategic subject that ERA has been working on for many years and it certainly deserves a renewed focus, if only, to highlight the slow evolution of such a part of the industry so critical for the future success of Europe's airlines.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Wednesday, 20 March 2013 16:38 |
|
The Emissions Trading Scheme is yet a further example of inappropriate, laborious and unfair legislation that is not fit for purpose.
Identifying someone else's mistakes rarely engenders their friendship. Nevertheless, sometimes it needs to be done. Consider, for example, a pilot who makes a genuine mistake resulting in a serious incident or accident. He/she knows that it is likely that he/she will face the possibility of a drawn-out criminal prosecution. If it is not a mistake and wilful neglect is involved, the chance of criminal prosecution becomes almost a certainty. If Europe's regulators and politicians consider the treatment of pilots in these circumstances to be 'fair', then contrast it with their own lack of accountability of when they 'get it wrong'.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Wednesday, 28 November 2012 14:37 |
|
Two decades ago the intra-European sector of air transport was eagerly awaiting the implementation of legislation granting new operating freedoms and removing restrictions based on years of State protectionism. A new era of exciting unprecedented market opportunities was to be created and airlines would be able to compete in a liberalised environment based on their individual business models and competence. For a few years it worked – more or less.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Wednesday, 20 March 2013 16:55 |
|
February is always a challenging month – the excitement and optimism of the New Year is replaced by the reality of maintaining the momentum through the remainder of the winter season. However, there is always something positive for ERA to focus on, for example, just how remarkably adaptive to change aviation is.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Wednesday, 20 March 2013 15:21 |
|
Airlines who go beyond the call of duty when improving safety requirements deserve to be rewarded with better insurance premiums
It is in everybody's interests for an airline to be safe. As primary stakeholders, manufacturers, passengers and crew have clear safety interests, as do aircraft insurers. However, while insurers have an obvious business interest to earn more in premiums than they pay out in claims, it seems that they do little to reward those airlines that do far more than simply meet the minimum regulatory safety requirements.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
|
|